{"id":411,"date":"2006-12-28T17:31:59","date_gmt":"2006-12-28T17:31:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/archives\/2006\/12\/28\/the-end-of-year-dilemma-2\/"},"modified":"2006-12-28T17:31:59","modified_gmt":"2006-12-28T17:31:59","slug":"the-end-of-year-dilemma-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.filmdetail.com\/2006\/12\/28\/the-end-of-year-dilemma-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The end of year dilemma"},"content":{"rendered":"
It is that time of year where critics start compiling their end of year lists<\/a>. But if, like me, you are based in the UK then there is always a problem.<\/p>\n Films often get released here a couple of months after their US release, so outstanding titles like Brokeback Mountain<\/strong>, Grizzly Man<\/strong> and The New World<\/strong> end up in a strange twilight zone. They are 2005 films that end up in the 2006 best of list. And that is just wrong isn’t it?<\/p>\n If you go to the IMDb and look up The New World<\/a> it is listed as a 2005 film, even though it got a UK release in February 2006. My solution is to just list the best films I’ve seen this year and ammend the previous year’s list accordingly.<\/p>\n